0.06/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 1920 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 240 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 05:34:34 EDT 2025 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.45 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 240s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 240s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # post_as_ho10 with pid 1991 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by post_as_ho10 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 130s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2000 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 130s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # Proof found! 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, c0: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, cS: $i > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_25, type, cEVEN1: $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, cIND: $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_27, type, cODD1: $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_28, type, cPEANO1: $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_29, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_30, type, esk2_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(cODD1_def, axiom, ((cODD1)=(^[X1:$i]:(~((cEVEN1 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p', cODD1_def)). 0.18/0.47 thf(cEVEN1_def, axiom, ((cEVEN1)=(^[X1:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((X2 @ c0)&![X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3))))))=>(X2 @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p', cEVEN1_def)). 0.18/0.47 thf(cPEANO1_def, axiom, ((cPEANO1)<=>((![X4:$i]:(((cS @ X4)!=(c0)))&![X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((cS @ X5)=(cS @ X6))=>((X5)=(X6)))))&(cIND))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p', cPEANO1_def)). 0.18/0.47 thf(cIND_def, axiom, ((cIND)<=>![X2:$i > $o]:((((X2 @ c0)&![X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X2 @ (cS @ X3)))))=>![X3:$i]:((X2 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p', cIND_def)). 0.18/0.47 thf(cTHM404, conjecture, ((cPEANO1)=>?[X1:$i]:((cODD1 @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dmDgABE4Um/E---3.1_1908.p', cTHM404)). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~((![X14:$i > $o]:((((X14 @ c0)&![X15:$i]:(((X14 @ X15)=>(X14 @ (cS @ (cS @ X15))))))=>(X14 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cODD1_def])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_6, plain, ((cEVEN1)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((X2 @ c0)&![X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3))))))=>(X2 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cEVEN1_def])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_7, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~((![X14:$i > $o]:((((X14 @ c0)&![X15:$i]:(((X14 @ X15)=>(X14 @ (cS @ (cS @ X15))))))=>(X14 @ Z0)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_8, axiom, ((cPEANO1)=(((![X4:$i]:(((cS @ X4)!=(c0)))&![X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((cS @ X5)=(cS @ X6))=>((X5)=(X6)))))&(![X16:$i > $o]:((((X16 @ c0)&![X17:$i]:(((X16 @ X17)=>(X16 @ (cS @ X17)))))=>![X18:$i]:((X16 @ X18)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cPEANO1_def, cIND_def])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((((![X19:$i]:(((cS @ X19)!=(c0)))&![X20:$i, X21:$i]:((((cS @ X20)=(cS @ X21))=>((X20)=(X21)))))&![X22:$i > $o]:((((X22 @ c0)&![X23:$i]:(((X22 @ X23)=>(X22 @ (cS @ X23)))))=>![X24:$i]:((X22 @ X24)))))=>?[X1:$i]:(~(![X25:$i > $o]:((((X25 @ c0)&![X26:$i]:(((X25 @ X26)=>(X25 @ (cS @ (cS @ X26))))))=>(X25 @ X1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM404]), c_0_7]), c_0_8])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X27:$i, X28:$i, X29:$i, X30:$i > $o, X32:$i, X33:$i, X34:$i > $o]:((((((cS @ X27)!=(c0))&(((cS @ X28)!=(cS @ X29))|((X28)=(X29))))&(((X30 @ (esk1_1 @ X30))|~(X30 @ c0)|(X30 @ X32))&(~(X30 @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ X30)))|~(X30 @ c0)|(X30 @ X32))))&(((X34 @ (esk2_2 @ X33 @ X34))|~(X34 @ c0)|(X34 @ X33))&(~(X34 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_2 @ X33 @ X34))))|~(X34 @ c0)|(X34 @ X33))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ X1)|~((X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2)))))|~((X2 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(X3))|((cS @ X1)!=(cS @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((cS @ (cS @ (esk2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(((Z0)!=(X1)))))))=(X1))|((c0)=(X1)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_11])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((cS @ X1)!=(c0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((cS @ (esk2_2 @ (cS @ X1) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(((Z0)!=(cS @ X1))))))=(X1))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])]), c_0_14])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])]), ['proof']). 0.18/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 11 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 12 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 31 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 5 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 25 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 55 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 29 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 1 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 10 0.18/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 2 0.18/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 19 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 13 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 19 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 6 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 31 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 1 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1657 0.18/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 348 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.004 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages 0.18/0.47 % E exiting 0.18/0.47 % E exiting 0.18/0.47 EOF